Position:home>Experts Forum>Farming land reform releases larger institution energy
Farming land reform releases larger institution energy
From;  Author:Stand originally


Because regard the farmer of collective member as the individual,to collective all land in principle do not have droit, have access only, and of collective land possessory not quite clear, so, have merely to collective land originally manage, the organization of collective economy of villages and towns that runs attributive or villager committee, often decide for the farmer with the name with possessory collective, in land commandeer, contract, be on the move and the interest of the farmer of the enroach on in dealing with of motor-driven ground.

Allow a peasant to collective all land access are restricted less. Above all the farmer cannot do guaranty to have loan with the land that contracts, this is to cause a farmer loan is at present bad main reason. Next, peasant land contracts of authority be on the move get a lot of limitation, its curtilage base also cannot rent external and sell one's own things, the collective land access of the farmer and townsman (contain industrial and commercial business) state-owned land access (contain curtilage base) cannot accomplish with the ground, coequal, with valence, these land asset with only farmer cannot capitalization, why to obtain and even the property income that increases a farmer.

Make land natural resources reasonable inside whole society limits configure. On one hand, the droit of collective land cannot be in different collective (villages and towns and village) between undertake transferring; On the other hand, the member beyond this collective cannot contract directly this collective land. Although the land of the farmer contracts,authority can be made over, but because land contracts,doctrine regulation land contracts of authority make over period must not contract more than period, this restricted the people long-term investment to land, limitted the urban capital move to the country especially.

On the other hand, the land that promulgated 2003 contracts doctrine regulation, the farmer enters Wu of a wide place in the road to be versed in or settle, still preserve raw land contract authority, and enter big in urban Wu labour is resident, want those who abandon raw land to contract to counterpoise and cannot get any compensation. This is met not only block up city changes a course, because the farmer contracts to counterpoise and would rather abandon be in to preserve land big in the opportunity with resident city, and the dimensions that also goes against a country to achieve land is managed.

Eliminate land to contract the instability with inherent power. A of this kind of instability main reason depends on praedial collective system of ownership just about: Because the farming ground of an area is by the farmer collective of this area all, so when individual farmer leaves this area, he must abandon the use of land of this area collective; And appear when this area when new farmer, the land access that other farmer enjoys wants necessarily by reapportion, in order to satisfy the land requirement of new farmer. The result is, as the change of area population, the allocation of land must be made ceaselessly adjust.
Previous 1 23 4 Next